Humber/Ontario Real Estate Course 3 Exam Practice

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the Humber/Ontario Real Estate Course 3 Exam with our comprehensive quiz. Dive into engaging practice questions that will enhance your understanding and readiness for the test. Elevate your confidence and get ready to ace your exam!

Practice this question and more.


What is a disadvantage of the income approach in real estate valuation?

  1. Is the difficulty in getting exact construction costs.

  2. Is the inability to accurately estimate depreciation.

  3. Is the difficulty in making adjustments for differences between comparable properties.

  4. Is the inability to accurately arrive at a precise overall cap rate when relying on marketplace data.

The correct answer is: Is the inability to accurately arrive at a precise overall cap rate when relying on marketplace data.

The income approach is a common method of real estate valuation that focuses on the income-producing potential of a property. A key aspect of this approach is the capitalization rate (cap rate), which is used to determine the present value of future income streams. One significant disadvantage of this approach is the challenge in accurately determining the cap rate, especially in fluctuating or complex marketplace conditions. The cap rate is often derived from recent sales of comparable income-producing properties, and various factors, including market demand, economic conditions, and property specifics, can create variability. This makes it difficult to establish a precise overall cap rate that accurately reflects the value of the property being evaluated. In contrast, some issues identified by the other options—such as estimating construction costs, estimating depreciation, and making adjustments for property differences—are generally more related to the cost approach and the sales comparison approach rather than being unique limitations of the income approach. These aspects are inherent challenges in various valuation methods but do not specifically highlight the nuanced difficulties faced when determining a cap rate. Thus, focusing on the market's influence and the complexities it introduces makes the chosen answer relevant to the challenges faced with the income approach in property valuation.